On 11 October 2021, the Real Property Amendment (Certificates of Title) Act 2021 commenced, which abolished the Certificates of Title (CTs) and the control of the right to deal (CoRD) framework. All existing CTs have been cancelled and CTs will no longer be issued. Existing CTs will not need to be produced, and CoRD holder consent will not be required, for a dealing or plan to be registered. All existing Guidelines subject to this change are currently being reviewed and will be updated to reflect these changes. For further information regarding the abolition of CTs, please see https://www.registrargeneral.nsw.gov.au/property-and-conveyancing/eConveyancing/abolition-of-certificates-of-title

Claims to centre line of road (Ad Medium Filum Viae)

There is a presumption (or rule of construction) that a conveyance of land bounded by a road will include half the road 'usque ad medium filum viae'. The ad medium filum rule applies to a transfer of land under the Real Property Act 1900, where the transferor is the owner of the site of the road. In re Priddle (State Report Vol 54 page 1916), and Wood v Mittagong Shire Council 1977. The fact that a certificate of title does not indicate that the fee extends to the centre of the road does not preclude the operation of the rule, if the circumstances surrounding the origin and history of the road do not rebut the presumption that ad medium filum applies.

A landowner entitled to half or the whole of an adjoining road by virtue of the ad medium filum viae rule, may make application to the Registrar General to be recorded as registered proprietor of the land. Under this common law rule it is presumed that if a road is bounded by or passes through a property, the title to the property would extend to include the fee simple of so much of the traversing road as is enclosed within the property, or to include the fee simple up to the middle thread of the boundary road for the length of its frontage.

If one of the parcels lying on either side of the traversing road was conveyed and described in the conveyance as being bounded by that road, there is also a rule which provides, that in construing that description, it will be presumed that the title conveyed extends to the middle thread, even though the dimensions or area stated in the document do not include any part of the road.


The presumption of ad medium filum viae can be rebutted where it can be shown that the vendor does not have title to the road, or that the vendor had title but conveyed it to another. In New South Wales the application of the presumption has been largely restricted by legislation.

The presumption is also rebutted if the road provided in the subdivision gave access to a residue area or the conveyance granted a right of way over the road. Attorney-General v Wilcox (Tasmanian Law Report Vol 54 page 985) and Permanent Trustee Co. Ltd. v Pangas 1992.

The rule does not apply in respect to any Crown Grant fronting a Crown boundary road.

Since 1 January 1920, the rule is rebutted, except as to minerals, where the fee simple of the public road is vested in the council see ss.145 and 146 Roads Act 1993.

Since the enactment of s.45A Real Property Act 1900, a title for land abutting on a road is deemed to include the soil of the road ad medium filum unless:

  • the soil is vested in the roads authority
  • the rule of construction mentioned by that section has been rebutted or
  • it is a classified road to which the section does not apply.


Most folios of the Register are inconclusive as to which, if any, of the rebuttal contingencies have taken effect. Any person who applies for the express inclusion in a folio of the Register of the site of a road is required to prove that rebuttal has not taken effect. NSW LRS will not of its own motion, search the chain of title for evidence of the rebuttal of the rule of construction. An person applying for title to the site of a road is required to furnish a Request form 11R (PDF 131 KB) and should supply:

  • evidence of non-dedication of the road to the public, such evidence to be confirmed by council,
  • a statutory declaration by the registered proprietor that they are not aware of any fact or circumstances attending the acquisition of title by themselves, or any of their predecessors, or occurring subsequently, which would rebut the presumed extension ad medium filum, and
  • a certificate by their solicitor or by some other qualified person stating that they have examined all relevant documents of title from the date of creation of the road and have found nothing therein to indicate that the rule of construction has been rebutted.

NSW LRS Legal Services will make an assessment of all claims.

Where the land comprising the road is Old System, Limited or Qualified Title the claim must be based on a Primary Application over land defined in a new deposited plan of survey, defining the claimants adjoining land and the claimed ad medium filum land as one lot, together with the relevant evidence in support of the claim.

In view of the difficulty in certifying title to such roads and, as the registered proprietor of the adjoining land has the benefit of the presumption, the Registrar General will only give effect to an application in exceptional circumstances.

See Baalman and Wells [paragraph 310.800] and Hallmann [paras 4.5 and 7.46].